Lauren G.
2/16/2017
I moved in here during the fall after a personal situation left me in a jam needing to find a place very quickly. Jesse from the leasing office was so accommodating in showing me the place within...
Putnam Green
Closed
(6)
Photos
31 Putnam Grn
Greenwich, CT 06830
Discover the charm of Putnam Green in Greenwich, CT, where cozy studio and one-bedroom apartments await. This hidden gem boasts a gorgeous pool, state-of-the-art fitness center, and a spacious lounge for residents to unwind and socialize. The community within a community is expertly managed by LCOR's professional staff, ensuring top-notch on-site management and maintenance services for a worry-free living experience.
Embrace the tranquility and convenience of Putnam Green, where every detail is designed to enhance your lifestyle. Whether you're lounging by the pool, breaking a sweat in the fitness center, or enjoying the company of neighbors in the communal spaces, this residential haven offers a perfect blend of comfort and style. Come home to Putnam Green and experience a seamless living experience in the heart of Greenwich.
Generated using this place's available information
Also at this address
Reviews
1.56 reviews
Lindsey G.
2/3/2019
The centipede issue is true. Didn't have a choice to renew my lease at the time and I am so regretful that I did. I'm counting the days until I can get out of here. I've had over 100 centipedes...
Lorraine O.
8/17/2022
Terrible complex , not kept up its old and run down. They don't maintain the grounds and the building needs to be painted and gutters cleaned. Terribly managed, do not move here !
Thomas H.
10/22/2018
This is the worst complex and management organization. They have no regard for people that live in the "low cost" section of the complex and Brian Lauro is just rotten person to deal with. The...
Becca C.
9/13/2019
I was really disappointed in the treatment that I received from the staff at Putnam Green. While apartment hunting, I came across listings for available apartments there. The dog policy said that...
See a problem?